Development and Implementation of Video-Recorded Simulation Scenarios to Facilitate Case-Based Learning Discussions for Medical Students' Virtual Anesthesiology Clerkship.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic presented unique challenges to medical student education. Medical student activities involving direct patient contact were limited, challenging anesthesiology programs to develop innovative means of presenting a clinical experience to trainees. In response, the Department of Anesthesiology at the University of Minnesota Medical School quickly transitioned its introductory anesthesiology clerkship to be entirely virtual. We designed the resulting curriculum to provide medical students with the most experiential learning experience possible. Methods: We created and conducted a virtual curriculum for medical students that incorporated video-recorded simulation-based scenarios to facilitate case-based learning discussions (CBLDs). At the end of their 2-week rotation, students completed a postclerkship survey with Likert-scale questions and an open-ended question intended to elicit feedback and evaluate the efficacy of the virtual curriculum. Results: Twenty-eight medical students finished the 2-week virtual anesthesiology clerkship over eight blocks, with all 28 students completing the postclerkship survey. Survey responses demonstrated that the virtual clerkship met or exceeded expectations in all areas. A majority of students (74%, 14 of the 19 who answered the associated question) felt that the faculty-led CBLD exercises were informative. All 28 students agreed or strongly agreed that the virtual assignments were valuable and facilitated learning. Discussion: We successfully implemented a virtual anesthesiology clerkship curriculum in response to constraints presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. The virtual format provides trainees with a simulated clinical experience that can be utilized not only during future pandemics but also in modern training curricula.

The construction of patient quality management model in oral post anesthesia care unit in China: a grounded theory approach.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, people have paid more and more attention to the quality of physical and mental health recovery after oral surgery anesthesia. As a remarkable feature of patient quality management, it can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative complications and pain in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). However, the patient management model in oral PACU remains unknown, especially in China. The purpose of this study is to explore the management elements of patient quality management in the oral PACU and to construct the management model. METHODS: Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory method was used to explore the experiences of three anesthesiologists, six anesthesia nurses and three administrators working in oral PACU. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted using face-to-face in a tertiary stomatological hospital from March to June, 2022. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed according to QSR NVivo 12.0 qualitative analysis tool. RESULTS: Three themes and ten subthemes were identified through an active analysis process, including three of the core team members: stomatological anesthesiologists, stomatological anesthesia nurses and administrators, three of the main functions: education and training, patient care and quality control and four of the team operation processes: analysis, plan, do, check. CONCLUSION: The patient quality management model of the oral PACU is helpful for the professional identity and career development of stomatological anesthesia staff in China, which can accelerate the professional development of oral anesthesia nursing quality. According to the model, the patient's pain and fear will decrease, meanwhile, safety and comfort will increase. It can make contributions to the theoretical research and clinical practice in the future.

The Year in Electrophysiology: Selected Highlights From 2022.

This special article is the fifth in an annual series for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The authors would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief, Dr Kaplan, the Associate Editor-in-Chief, Dr Augoustides, and the editorial board for the opportunity to author this series, which summarizes the key research papers in the electrophysiology (EP) field relevant to cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesiologists. These articles are shaping perioperative EP procedures and practices, such as pulsed-field ablation, cryoablation for first-line treatment for atrial fibrillation, advancements in conduction system pacing, safety issues related to smartphones and cardiac implantable electronic devices, and alterations in EP workflow as the world emerges from the COVID-19 pandemic. Special emphasis is placed on the implications of these advancements for the anesthetic care of patients undergoing EP procedures.

When policy meets reality: the new 18-hour on-call shift policy and the Israeli anesthesia workforce crisis.

BACKGROUND: The Israeli physician workforce faces multiple challenges. These include planned policies reducing physician on-call from 26 to 18 h and, from 2026, allowing only graduates of Ministry of Health approved foreign medical schools to take the Israeli licensing examination and an ongoing physician shortage (2019: Israel had 3.19 physicians/1000 persons vs. OECD average of 3.49 physicians/1000 persons). This study examines the potential impact of these planned policies on the Israeli anesthesiology workforce. METHODS: Surveys conducted among 34 public and private Israeli hospital anesthesiology department chairs collected data on their department's number of weekday on-call anesthesiologists and current shortage of anesthesiologists. A subsequent survey collected data on each anesthesiologist in the workforce, including the country where they studied medicine. RESULTS: Each weekday night there were 114 on-call anesthesiologists; 72 residents and 42 attendings. Using productive work coefficients, this translates to 104 resident and 51 attending anesthesiologists. Furthermore, 21 departments had existing anesthesia workforce shortages totaling 110 anesthesiologists. There were 873 anesthesiologists from non-OECD countries whose medical schools are not accredited by the World Federation for Medical Education, of whom 332 were residents (61.9% of residents). Only 20.1% of anesthesiology residents were Israeli medical school graduates. CONCLUSIONS: Descriptive survey data assessed the immediate and long-term consequences for the healthcare system and anesthesiology workforce of two new Health Ministry policies. Implementing the 18-h policy will immediately remove from the daytime workforce 155 anesthesiologists and who will be unavailable to staff elective surgery operating rooms. This will compound the current national shortage of 110 anesthesiologists. It is unclear how to replace this shortfall since there are no surplus Israeli physicians and very few Israeli graduates choose anesthesiology as a specialty. This situation will be exacerbated after 2026 when graduates of certain foreign medical schools will be unable to enter the medical workforce, further reducing the pool of potential anesthesiology residents. Both policies were promulgated without adequate operational and budgetary planning or fiscal or workforce resources; implementation of the 18-h on-call policy has already been postponed. Therefore, new or updated policies must be accompanied by specific operational plans, budgetary allocations and funds for additional workforce.

Simulation in healthcare during COVID-19: An experience with residents in Anaesthesiology.

BACKGROUND: The restrictions to stop COVID-19 pandemic have had a negative impact in simulation, however, it is imperative to develop new strategies that facilitate healthcare education. OBJECTIVE: To describe a simulation in healthcare based on the learning of Non-Technical Skills (NTS) and performed under the restrictions of COVID-19 Pandemic. METHODS: Quasi-experimental study of an educational activity performed through simulation with anaesthesiology residents in November 2020. Twelve residents participated in two consecutive days. A questionnaire was filled related to the performance of NTS that encompasses leadership, teamwork and decision making. The complexity of the scenarios and the NTS results obtained between the two days were analysed. Advantages and challenges were documented when a clinical simulation is performed under COVID-19 restrictions. RESULTS: The global performance of the teams improved when comparing first and second day (79.5% vs 88.6%, p<0.01). Leadership was the worst section rated, however, was the one that showed the best improvement (70% vs 87.5%, p<0.01). The complexity of the simulation cases had no relation with the group performance in leadership and teamwork but affected task management results. General satisfaction was over 75%. The main challenges to develop the activity were the technology required to adapt virtuality to simulation and the time spent for the preparation of it. No cases of COVID-19 were reported within the first month after the activity. CONCLUSION: Clinical simulation can be done in the context of COVID-19 Pandemic, obtaining satisfactory learning results but requiring the adaptation of institutions to the new challenges it implies.

Retailoring training programmes in anaesthesia and intensive care after the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we want to collect all the adaptations that anaesthesiology training has faced because of the health crisis and social distancing measures resulting from coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19). We reviewed new teaching tools launched during the COVID-19 outbreak worldwide and particularly those implemented by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC). RECENT FINDINGS: Globally, COVID-19 has interrupted health services and all aspects of training programmes. These unprecedented changes have led to teaching and trainee support innovation tools, focusing on online learning and simulation programmes. Airway management, critical care and regional anaesthesia, have been enhanced during the pandemic, while there were major obstacles in paediatrics, obstetrics and pain medicine. SUMMARY: The COVID-19 pandemic has altered profoundly the functioning of health systems worldwide. Anaesthesiologists and trainees have fought on the front lines of the battle against COVID-19. As a result, training in anaesthesiology during the last 2 years has focused on managing patients in intensive care. New training programmes have been designed to continue teaching residents of this speciality, focusing on e-learning and advanced simulation. It is necessary to present a review describing the impact that this turbulent period has had on the different subsections of anaesthesiology and to review the innovative measures that have been implemented to address these possible deficits in education and training.

Differences in perception of online anesthesiology between Thai medical students and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: Traditional anesthesiology learning was disrupted by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and replaced by online learning. Students and teachers did not prepare well for this change. Determining the differences in perceptions can close the gap and develop more effective curricula. Our study aims to compare students' and teachers' perceptions of online anesthesiology learning. METHODS: We conducted a prospective descriptive study, a cross-sectional survey between July 2020 and January 2021 in the Anesthesiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Our participants were fifth-year medical students and teachers participating in online anesthesiology. We compared the perception of the teaching process, support system, learning outcomes, satisfaction, and preference. Using an online structured questionnaire survey with a 4-point Likert scale to measure the degree of agreement with each item. We analyzed the difference between students' and teachers' perceptions by topic. RESULTS: We received responses from 174 students and 24 teachers. Students had a significantly higher proportion of positive perceptions than teachers on the teaching process (theoretical teaching, problem-based learning, feedback, and response system), on a support system (technological support, connectivity, and learning materials), on learning outcomes (clinical practice readiness, critical thinking, long-term memory, and enthusiasm), satisfaction score, and online learning preference (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Differences in perception were high in many aspects of online anesthesiology learning. This perception gap was particularly evident in the teaching process, support system, and learning outcomes. And Thai students had more preference for online learning than teachers. Strategies to reduce the gap should focus on teachers' training and supporting online learning should be concerned.

Sleep in Residents: A Comparison between Anesthesiology and Occupational Medicine Interns.

Sleep deprivation is a significant risk to the health and judgment of physicians. We wanted to investigate whether anesthesiology residents (ARs) who work only one night shift per week have different physical and mental health from occupational medicine residents (OMRs) who do not work at night. A total of 21 ARs and 16 OMRs attending a university general hospital were asked to wear an actigraph to record sleep duration, heart rate and step count and to complete a questionnaire for the assessment of sleep quality, sleepiness, fatigue, occupational stress, anxiety, depression and happiness. ARs had shorter sleep duration than OMRs; on average, they slept 1 h and 20 min less (p < 0.001). ARs also had greater daytime sleepiness, a higher heart rate and lower happiness than OMRs. These results should be interpreted with caution given the cross-sectional nature of the study and the small sample size, but they are an incentive to promote sleep hygiene among residents.

Burnout and depression among anesthesiology trainees in the United States: An updated National Survey.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: A high prevalence of burnout, depression and suicidal ideation has been reported among anesthesiology trainees. Over the last decade, there has been a significant emphasis on the development of wellness programs in academic departments to mitigate the prevalence and effects of burnout during anesthesiology training. Therefore, we aimed to reevaluate the prevalence of burnout and depression in anesthesiology trainees in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Anesthesiology Department. PATIENTS: A nationally representative sample of 1000 anesthesiology trainees in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: A 33-item questionnaire consisting of 1) burnout, 2) depression, 3) job satisfaction, 4) family support, 5) work characteristics, 6) demographic factors, 7) self-reported errors, and 8) impact of COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: We received 384 responses. Twenty-four percent (91/384) of the respondents met the criteria for high burnout risk and 58/384 (15%) of the respondents screened positive for depression. Multivariable analysis revealed that: (1) hours per week > 70, (odds ratio [OR; 95% confidence interval {CI}] = 3.1 [1.4-6.8], P=0.005 and (2) overnight calls per month > 7 (OR [95% CI] = 2.5 [1.0- 6.0], P=0.03 were independent factors for increased odds of burnout whereas the presence of (3) married/domestic partnership (OR [95% CI} = 0.52 [0.32-0.85], P=0.01 was associated with lower odds of burnout and/or depression. Ten percent (4/40) of high burnout/depression residents reported that they often times fall short in the quality of care provided to patients compared to 0.36% (1/275) residents with low burnout/depression scores, P < 0.001. Similarly, 22% (9/40) of high burnout/depression residents reported that they often times did not have enough attention to their patients compared to 4% (11/275) residents with low burnout/depression scores, P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: We report a still concerning but significantly lower rate of burnout and depression in anesthesiology trainees than previously reported a decade ago. This suggests that efforts on wellness implemented by academic programs have positively impacted the work experience of anesthesia trainees.

Women Authorship Trends in the Highest-Impact Anesthesiology Journals from 2005 to 2021.

Background: Although women and men have matriculated into medical schools in similar proportions since the 1980s, recent data indicate that anesthesiology is lagging in gender equity, especially in academic leadership roles.1,2 As promotion in academic medicine is strongly influenced by publications, understanding whether a lack of women authorship is contributing to this gender gap is crucial.3,4 This article aims to assess how woman authorship trends have changed in the last 16 years, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: The five highest impact journals in anesthesia were identified as Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anesthesiology, PAIN, and Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. Number of total authors, including women, men, and unknown gender authors as well as incidence of woman first and/or last author, was documented from articles published in 2005, 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2021. Results: This analysis shows that women are gaining representation in anesthesia publications. Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in the total number of women authors and women first and last authorship. However, as of 2021, women still only represented ∼40% of total and first authors and ∼24% of last authors. In addition, increase in first/last woman authorship was not present in all journals when stratified. Conclusion: These journal differences may suggest the editorial evaluation process as a potential source of gender bias. There was a statistically significant relationship between women senior authors and articles with 50% or more women authors, indicating that woman mentorship is contributing to closing equity gap. These data present a starting point for further investigations into gender disparities within anesthesia to continue the forward progression for women in academic medicine.

Turnover Time Between Elective Operative Cases: Does the Witching Hour Exist for the Operating Room?

BACKGROUND: Efficient resource management in the operating room (OR) contributes significantly to healthcare expenditure and revenue generation for health systems. We aim to assess the influence that surgeon, anesthesiology, and nursing team assignments and time of day have on turnover time (TOT) in the OR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of elective cases at a single academic hospital that were completed between Monday and Friday between the hours of 0700 and 2359 from July 1, 2017, through March 31, 2018. Emergent cases and unplanned, add-on cases were excluded. Data regarding patient characteristics, OR teams, TOT, and procedure start and end times were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2174 total cases across 13 different specialties were included in our study. A multivariate regression of relevant variables affecting TOT was performed. Consecutive specialty (p < 0.0001), consecutive surgeon (p < 0.0001), anesthesiologist (p < 0.0001), and prior case ending before 1400 (p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of lower TOT. A receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.848 and a cutoff of 1400 having the highest sensitivity and specificity for TOT difference. CONCLUSIONS: TOT can be significantly affected by the time of the day the procedure is performed. Staffing availability during late procedures and the differences in how OR team staff are scheduled may affect OR efficiency. Additional studies may be needed to determine the long-term implications of changes implemented to decrease organizational operational costs related to the OR.

Infection Control for Perioperative Ultrasonography and Echocardiography.

Ultrasound technology has revolutionized point-of-care diagnostics, decision-making, and the guidance of interventional procedures in Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine. Recent literature has highlighted important infection control considerations when performing transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography, point-of-care ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided procedures. This narrative review focuses on operator precautions and disinfection methods and summarizes key recommendations from the international Echocardiography and Radiology Societies.